Conglomerability, disintegrability and the comparative principle

Abstract Our aim here is to present a result that connects some approaches justifying countable additivity. This allows us better understand the force of recent argument for additivity due Easwaran. We have two main points. First, Easwaran’s in favour should little persuasive on those permissive probabilists who already made their peace with violations conglomerability. As our shows, premiss – comparative principle strictly stronger than conglomerability (and equivalent disintegrability). Second, connections between and other probabilistic concepts clearly view, we point out opponents can still make case an arbitrary stopping finite full